Were Cro-Magnum Women Orgiastic?
I tend to subscribe to the theory that females are gangbang oriented. This only stands to reason from an evolutionary point of view.
The female will be most likely to be impregnated and breed if she has intercourse with a large number of males. If she is monogamous, there is the chance that the husband will have a low sperm count, or will simply get bored, leading to failure in impregnation, and failure in the species to reproduce itself effectively.
On the other hand, human beings have a ridiculously long childhood. A baby cow pops out of his mother's womb on all 4 legs, ready for action. A human takes almost 2 years to learn to walk, and about 10 years to become at all productive or independent.
Obviously, the female can not do it alone. So there must be a mating system where the male helps out.
My theory is that in the early days of the human race, people did not have any idea how babies were created. So on the one hand, women would be thoroughly promiscuous sexually, but yet have one male that they bonded to as a husband. The male would also be thoroughly promiscuous but bonded emotionally to his wife.
There is really no reason that promiscuity should interfere with the bonds of marriage and child-rearing, when you think about it. To them, it was probably just a form of entertainment, like watching TV. So who cares who you have sex with? What is important is the more enduring bonds of a primitive matrimony for child-rearing.
But all of this leads to the mis-match between males and females sexually. Females are designed by evolution to have sex with as many men as possible. So they want to keep going for a long time.
Men, on the other hand, are designed to pop in and pop off, attempting to impregnate the maximum number of potentially fertile females. Consequently, women want men to take longer then a couple minutes in the sex act, simply because they really want to get gangbanged. But modern society doesn't allow it.
But in truth, it rarely takes men more than a couple minutes to do the deed and go to sleep.
Evolution is the culprit.
Draft 2: 11/14/07
The female will be most likely to be impregnated and breed if she has intercourse with a large number of males. If she is monogamous, there is the chance that the husband will have a low sperm count, or will simply get bored, leading to failure in impregnation, and failure in the species to reproduce itself effectively.
On the other hand, human beings have a ridiculously long childhood. A baby cow pops out of his mother's womb on all 4 legs, ready for action. A human takes almost 2 years to learn to walk, and about 10 years to become at all productive or independent.
Obviously, the female can not do it alone. So there must be a mating system where the male helps out.
My theory is that in the early days of the human race, people did not have any idea how babies were created. So on the one hand, women would be thoroughly promiscuous sexually, but yet have one male that they bonded to as a husband. The male would also be thoroughly promiscuous but bonded emotionally to his wife.
There is really no reason that promiscuity should interfere with the bonds of marriage and child-rearing, when you think about it. To them, it was probably just a form of entertainment, like watching TV. So who cares who you have sex with? What is important is the more enduring bonds of a primitive matrimony for child-rearing.
But all of this leads to the mis-match between males and females sexually. Females are designed by evolution to have sex with as many men as possible. So they want to keep going for a long time.
Men, on the other hand, are designed to pop in and pop off, attempting to impregnate the maximum number of potentially fertile females. Consequently, women want men to take longer then a couple minutes in the sex act, simply because they really want to get gangbanged. But modern society doesn't allow it.
But in truth, it rarely takes men more than a couple minutes to do the deed and go to sleep.
Evolution is the culprit.
Draft 2: 11/14/07
posted by Jack W. Orf | 6:04 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home