An Immodest Proposal

I had an interestingly crazy idea for Anthony Weiner's defense. I think that he should call a news conference at a nudist camp and appear buck naked. Also, all reporters, photographers, and guests wanting to attend the Press Conference would be required to attend buck naked.

I know that seems crazy at first, but when you think about it, it could be a good idea. Right now, Weiner is a dead man walking. His career is shot. So why not try something crazy? He has nothing to lose. Here's how he should set it up:

First, he would need to locate a nudist camp somewhere in the USA, or even outside it, where it would not be a crime to hold a nude news press conference and to broadcast it. This is important, since we wouldn't want anyone to get arrested.

Second, he should require that ALL reporters, journalists, protographers and guests attending the press conference would have to take off all of their clothes, and attend buck naked. Cell phones and cameras would also be allowed.

When Anthony Weiner appears on stage, buck naked in front of an audience of buck-naked reporters and photographers, he would simply say, "Hello, this is me. This is my body. Any questions?".

Because when you think about, what has Anthony Weiner really done that is so horrible? He has sent people pictures of one of his body parts. Would people get so excited if Weiner had sent out pictures of his toe, or his finger? This buck-naked Press Conference would make that clear.

Why is this a good idea? First, it would really be fun to see everybody in The Media squirm. I'm really sick and tired of all of their self-righteous yakking about how horrible and sick Anthony Weiner is. Now they would have to make a tough decision: Either attend the Press Conference buck naked, or else miss out on what might turn out to be the hottest press conference of the year. Media biggies would be compelled to attend the buck-naked Press Conference, because you can be sure that their younger, and more aggressive competitors would certainly be there.

Seeing that many naked people, and seeing the entirety of Anthony Weiner's body, might make people realize that that is what we are. We were born that way, to borrow a phrase. So what's the big deal?

My Take on Casey Anthony.

I liked the comment by John Kays on the Casey Anthony trial. I have not been following the trial in detail, but I am rather amazed at how overwhelmingly CIRCUMSTANTIAL the evidence is. Consider:

1. They are apparently supposing that there was a decomposing body in the trunk either because it might have smelled bad (that is uncertain), or because they found ONE hair. Imagine that: Someone being sent to the gas chamber on the evidence of one stupid hair!!!

I work with technology and sometimes I am overwhelmed at how childishly trusting people are about forensic technology that is EXTREMELY dubious. Are we to really believe that one single hair is enough of a sample to provide reliable evidence? How do we even know whose hair it is? It could be a hair from the head of the shopping-cart boy at Publix. Maybe when he was helping Casey load up her trunk with dead, decomposing beef and chicken (all of which were brutally and cold-bloodedly murdered), maybe one of his hairs blew off in the wind.

Indeed, a hair could even be blowing in the wind and could enter the trunk when it was opened.

2. As far as a hair indicating "decomposition" goes, is it not the case that Casey was probably buying large quantities of dead, butchered, decomposing meat and chicken in order to feed her family? Is the prosecution team aware that hamburger does not grow on trees? Are they aware that when you buy a raw steak or hamburger meat at Publix, some of the blood often seeps out of the package and out of the flimsy bags and can stain the trunk, leaving a residue?

A steer is an 800 pound mammal that was brutally murdered and then carved into pieces to be fed to carnivorous, flesh-eating monsters, like myself. By the time that this bloody, raw meat reaches the carnivore's trunk, it may have been dead for several days and is beginning to decay.

Are the so-called "experts" in this case (whoever they are) capable of distinguishing between the decomposition of a child's flesh and a lamb's or chicken's or bullock's flesh? How so? I would like to hear some DETAILS about how these great "experts" are determining that there is "decomposition" present.

3. Chloroform could also be used by the ranchers who handle steers. After all, on a ranch, you may have hundreds of 900-pound beasts who could easily kill the farmer if they were intelligent enough to follow their instincts and stampede. One way to subdue them might be the use of chloroform.

I would definitely look at the trunks of the cars of people who live in Casey Anthony's neighborhood and find out whether they ALSO have evidence of "decomposition" and "shockingly high" amounts of chloroform.

4. And another thing, if Casey Anthony murdered her daughter, why on earth would she be driving around with Caley's body decomposing in her trunk? That would be insanely stupid and extremely dangerous in terms of her being caught. It would extremely easy of her to dump Caley's little body almost anywhere. It's not dumping a 200 pound man. Casey would have no need to be driving around with Caley in her trunk.

But if Casey had indeed driven around for days with Calee in her trunk, it probably be indicative of insanity anyway.

5. Why would Casey want to use chloroform? If she wanted to drown Calee, she could easily hold her head under water. There would be no need to drug her or bash her skull.

6. Another massively dubious piece of circumstantial evidence is the evidence that Casey (or somebody) had done a Google search of "Chloroform". So what? Are they going to start arresting people for everything that they looked at on Google? And if Casey was just a brilliantly cold-blooded murderer, she probably would have known how to delete her "cookies". I delete my cookies and my history every day, and I'm not even a duplicitous murderer.

OH MY GOD!!! I MYSELF just did a Google search on "Chloroform" to see how it is spelled! Does this mean that I will be charged with MURDER 3 months from now? OH MY GOD! I better wear a chef's hat so that none of my hairs fall out on the kitchen floor and decompose with all the crumbs on the floor! OH MY GOD!


To conclude, I do not necessarily think that Casey is innocent or guilty. Someone needs to remind the TV JERKS that every American has a right to a fair trial by a jury of their peers, which is not the same as 50 million moronic TV viewers.

Someone should also remind those IDIOT prosecutors that their job is to find out who really murdered Calee, if she was murdered. Their job is not to just scrounge around and invent evidence to crucify Casey.